decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
EFF Makes Formal Objection to DRM in HTML5 | 215 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
EFF Makes Formal Objection to DRM in HTML5
Authored by: Gringo_ on Wednesday, May 29 2013 @ 09:00 PM EDT

I must be thick, but I don't actually get this.

Suppose I make a movie, and I want to make it available in return for some consideration such as pay per view or whatever. It seems to me DRM would allow to me to do that. Without DRM, I can't see how else to make it available for online viewing.

Of course I understand that I undoubtedly wouldn't be making any sales to those who are against DRM, but on the other hand, some people would only be too grateful for the opportunity to watch or download my movie for an acceptable price.

If we say there should be no DRM available in HTML5, then you have just killed a potential market for me.

Beyond that, I have recently subscribed to Netflix and I am really enjoying catching up on all the films I missed out on during the past few years. I have lately seen some really wonderful films that have given me a new perspective. AFAIK, it is DRM that permits me to watch these movies, is it not?

I know that FOSS advocates think everything should be free, but I am sorry - after investing a great deal of money to create my film I have no intention of giving it away for free.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I must be a bit thick
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 29 2013 @ 11:30 PM EDT
I'm having trouble understanding what's going on when on the one hand
EFF is bleating about DRM in HTML5; and on the other hand SFLC
is saying VP8 Licence Good, nothing to see here.

I know, I know, I'm about to get a dozen lectures on the difference
between patents and DRM. Maybe the song was right,
Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose ...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )