decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Based on reasonable royalty | 215 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Based on reasonable royalty
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 12:05 PM EDT
Here's hoping they get exactly what they asked for...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Yet Another Software Patent Lawsuit
Authored by: hAckz0r on Thursday, May 30 2013 @ 02:06 PM EDT
This patent looks to me to be nothing more than a document input, storage, and workflow management system. They seem to be simply implementing a Queue of documents/files and managing them without having to name each document or choose a directory to file it under. Aka a database storage/indexing system.

That said, I used to work for a company (Micronet Software Corp., Laurel MD) that developed a distributed document processing system that did this, back in the 1992-93 era. Documents were entered into the system, automatically scanned by the software, indexed based on the contents of the document, and the workflow management would queue those documents through to the appropriate personnel needed to process those documents. Each installation was allowed to create custom database fields to manage the documents based on their own needs. And yes, it stamped each document with a time stamp, just like this patent keeps harping on. Document management is not exactly rocket science (what I do today, so I know something about that) and why this software system deserved a patent I have no clue.

---
The Investors IP Law: The future health of a Corporation is measured as the inverse of the number of IP lawsuits they are currently litigating.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )