Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

You know it's bad when you get no results on Google | 401 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

You know it's bad when you get no results on Google

Authored by: AntiFUD on Tuesday, May 28 2013 @ 04:37 AM EDT

Simple. Qubhuts are cube shaped buildings where a company beginning with M,
store roundup resistant qubits, to ensure that they don't get together with
another qubit and become a qubyte. Please note that I didn't mention the
Schroedinger's cat conundrum that affects the construction of said qubhuts -
needless to say that it becomes exceedingly difficult to compute the actual
state(s) in which said qubits reside - said complexity increases exponentially
as the number of qubits alledgedly in said qubhut increases.

But definitely worthy of a patent if a) they can show a working model and b)
prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the concept is concrete rather than
abstract or a feature of nature.

PS. It always confuses me that the parentage of patents is always ignored when
they are filed. 'Cos we all know that Necessity is the mother of Invention.

---
IANAL - Free to Fight FUD - "to this very day"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Wow! - Authored by: artp on Tuesday, May 28 2013 @ 11:55 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )