decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Checking for? Really? | 401 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Checking for? Really?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 25 2013 @ 06:17 PM EDT

So you're okay with the police stopping people to ask for papers just to see if they're in the country illegally?

Last time I looked, this pesky language was still in the US Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause...

I, for one, am pleased to know at least one federal judge thinks that looking like one of those people is not sufficient probable cause.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge finds Ariz. sheriff’s office racially profiles Latinos in immigration patrols
Authored by: jplatt39 on Saturday, May 25 2013 @ 07:07 PM EDT
Look I am an old school New Englander who grew up in Southern New England when
that meant lots of Portuguese and Cape Verdean families who had been here since
Whaling days. Trying to tell them apart was my first lesson that race might be
more a cultural artifact than anything else -- of course there was mixing and in
fact some mixing of both with the WASPS. Now the families have been displaced
by Hispanics and Gentrification -- there isn't that much difference. And there
are white black and in-between immigrants all over. To name two prominent Latin
musicians, too, one of whom lives in France, Shakira is from Colombia. Munir
Hossn is Brazilian. Both come from families from Lebanon.

You can't tell who comes from where just by looking -- or even the name. And
you know what? You never could.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge finds Ariz. sheriff’s office racially profiles Latinos in immigration patrols
Authored by: PJ on Saturday, May 25 2013 @ 09:19 PM EDT
Ah, logic. But the judge said that logic doesn't trump the US Constitution, which sheriffs are bound by oath to uphold, I believe. Here is the judge's ruling [PDF], and if you take time to read it, you'll see that the judge said that the specific way this sheriff operated violated the Constitutional rights of his targets because they violated both the 4th and the 14th Amendments, and not even sheriffs are allowed to violate the law. And the US Constitution is inviolate. You can't pass local laws or have local customs that violate the US Constitution. Sooner or later, a judge will stop you, because that is what judges do.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge finds Ariz. sheriff’s office racially profiles Latinos in immigration patrols
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 25 2013 @ 09:39 PM EDT
>but realistically, how many whites or native Americans are going
to be illegal immigrants?

Until the mid-eighties, Ireland provided the most (both as a
percentage of the population, and raw numbers) illegal
immigrants to the United States.

I won't say which city in the United States has more illegal Irish
immigrants, than legal Irish and illegal immigrants from all of
South and Central America, combined.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )