|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 24 2013 @ 01:02 PM EDT |
Actually I do not remember.
Wasn't it that the case was without merit, but "you never know" how a
case could be won anyway when presented "smart" enough ?
I thought the code in question was already GPL'd by sco themselves, so no show.
Some show it became anyway.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 26 2013 @ 02:23 AM EDT |
Seems like education works both ways. 'Our' dear lady with
the red dress seems to have gotten somewhat more trigger-
happy with the contempt of pseudo-technical bogus.
Now we'll just have to wait for that attitude to propagate
through the rest of the judicial system.
I am keenly looking forward to the day when -finally- a judge
-upon being presented with the opening session of a 'case'
like this- responds in terms in similar as the main article.
I expect that a judge will -out of professionalism- always
initially approach each case with a certain level of
reasonable doubt, but remember those folks of 'Prenda'.
At the end of the day, Apple doing little more than
subjecting the judicial system to an education in technical
bogus. At some point the judges and juries of this world will
come to realize that -inside all those marvelous little
computer gadgets- there is no such thing as magic going on.
Very, very unfortunately, that same judicial system seems to
have very little regard for the damage being caused by its
own ignorance in the mean time.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
