decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
They patented WHAT? | 225 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
They patented WHAT?
Authored by: stegu on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 02:40 PM EDT
I simply cannot believe the level of stupidity that is allowed for patents, and
the extremely low threshold for something to be referred to as "a
technology" in legalese.

Perhaps I could patent my technology of pouring some of the milk first, then
adding corn flakes, and last pouring the rest of the milk, where
"some" in this case may be construed to mean "all",
"nothing" or any amount in between. This allows for an unprecedented
amount of flexibility in planning and executing the process of pouring milk on
corn flakes, it provides a useful test case for sour milk before you extract any
of the corn flakes from their container and possibly ruin them with sour milk,
and it incorporates the previous art of "pour-first" or
"pour-last" technologies as special cases.

"Technology". Pfft. The patent industry should have their toys taken
away from them, because they are clearly using them to beat other kids over the
head. The fact that they sometimes use them for their intended purpose is no
longer an excuse.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ummm...
Authored by: JamesK on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 02:47 PM EDT
How long have phone companies been providing ring back? I bet it's long before
that patent was filed. The patent examiner who approved that one should be
taken out back and shot!

---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )