|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 12:16 PM EDT |
I'm not sure the comparison makes much sense. What would a patent on music
look
like? What would copyright of an invention look like? Wouldn't a patent
on a piece of
music look a lot like copyright? And wouldn't a copyright on an
invention look a lot
like a patent? In the end, both grant exclusivity over an
idea for a determined time.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- The research should be rewarded != it should be patentable. - Authored by: albert on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 05:39 PM EDT
- Well, maybe that's why you're confused - Authored by: cjk fossman on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 05:45 PM EDT
- Well, maybe that's why you're confused - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 05:07 AM EDT
- Well, maybe that's why you're confused - Authored by: albert on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 09:47 AM EDT
- I think YOU'RE confused. - Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 12:24 PM EDT
- Er, right - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 22 2013 @ 05:24 AM EDT
- Er, right - Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, May 22 2013 @ 07:14 AM EDT
- Er, right - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 22 2013 @ 08:07 AM EDT
- Well, maybe that's why you're confused - Authored by: cjk fossman on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 01:02 PM EDT
|
|
|
|