decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Furthermore... | 225 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Furthermore...
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 10:08 AM EDT

I'm sorry I never really completed my thesis above. In the last paragraph I suddenly changed tack without giving you context because I just ran out of steam. But you get the idea all the same I'm sure.

So continuing in the same vain, talking about the contribution patents make to society, I wish to recall how software patents have advanced the art. As you all know, there were no software patents initially, and software struggled to even get off the ground until finally the first patents were granted and it really took off. Before then, computer scientists created a few "Hello world" programs, but nobody took software seriously. Who in their right mind back then, before you could get patent protection, would invest the time, energy and expense in developing software when somebody could come by and just take all your ideas and beat you to market? For twenty years there was no innovation at all. Software was just an academic curiosity - a big joke, because nobody could make any money with it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Furthermore... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 10:38 AM EDT
Software patents, mp3 in particular...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 11:26 AM EDT

Nice. But I rather think the example of the fashion industry works against you. Because there is no protection of ideas you just have to churn out any old rubbish as fast as you can. When was the last time you saw something genuinely attractive on a catwalk? Sustained investment is painfully absent.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

the ones who ended up with key patents historically were often the most aggressive and ruthless
Authored by: Wol on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 01:18 PM EDT
Edison tried to patent the light bulb.

AFTER he'd seen Joseph Swann's light bulb factory.

James Watt aggressively blocked any attempt by others to improve his steam
engine.

What were those reports here about someone flying in 1902? And as I like to
point out, the first successful aircraft was built here in Oxfordshire :-)

I'm sure others can add to the list ... Lemuelsen is an obvious one ...

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )