decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Ah, I see, it was about the comment title (n.t.) | 225 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
maybe oversight on my part, but what quote are you refering to ? (n.t.)
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 08:09 AM EDT
And, pray, what more do I need to quote?!

Frauenhofer DISCOVERED.

And DISCOVERIES are not eligible for patents, being laws of nature.

That quote was all I needed, or wanted. End of!

Now if their packaging was truly inventive, maybe they could have got an
invention on the packaging, but that's a completely different point. And seeing
as packaging is almost never inventive, they probably couldn't :-)

But you put another killer sentence right there for me. "innovative
algorithm". I know the courts seem to think that there exists
non-mathematical algorithhms, but as far as we are concerned here that is a
mathematical algorithm, and therefore it is ALSO non-patentable subject matter.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ah, I see, it was about the comment title (n.t.)
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 08:44 AM EDT
.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )