decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
They've MADE a qualified offer ... | 156 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
They've MADE a qualified offer ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 10:46 AM EDT
If that's true, and that constitutes a proper "qualifying
offer" under the terms of the consent decree, then I don't
understand why the whole issue isn't moot. Why is motorola
conceding they have additional steps to follow if they already
followed them?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

HAVE they conceded
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 01:38 PM EDT
Or is Apple merely claiming that?

If Motorola has made an offer, then the ball is in Apple's court. If Apple won't
play, then there is no just reason why Motorola shouldn't be able to enforce and
get an injunction.

Given Apple's wordplay and sword-dancing, I strongly suspect they are
"being economical with the truth". And with a Judge who seems only too
happy to take them at their word, well, I guess this is the obvious result.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )