Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 04:35 PM EDT |
And, just as technically, Apple didn't say "No, we won't accept a rate set
by you, judge.", They said, "If the rate is N or less, we won't
contest it."
The rate was never actually set, though that important bit seems to get glossed
over by PJ, and some of the other (usually much more precise contributors) these
days.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 23 2013 @ 03:33 PM EDT |
So Apple seems unwilling to enter a deal unless the rates are low enough to suit
them.
To me as a legal noob, doesn't that create a basis for Motorola to sue for
damages? As in
"Your Honor, those guys use our patent without a license and even refuse
negotiating one at a reasonable price. Can we please have X in damages, plus
punitive damages for willful infringement?"
Comments? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|