decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
EU trouble there | 156 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
EU trouble there
Authored by: Steve Martin on Saturday, May 18 2013 @ 04:50 PM EDT
Oh, and not to beat it up, but when I launch LO under Mint 14
and click "Help" / "About LibreOffice", it says that
LibreOffice is licensed under LGPL. Just something you might
want to look at when you get the code re-write done.


---
"When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

EU trouble there
Authored by: Wol on Sunday, May 19 2013 @ 05:06 AM EDT
http://www.libreoffice.org/developers-2

Which states that LO (as a whole) is LGPL because of all the code from Oracle
OOo.

It also states that LO is dual LGPL/MPL.

I hadn't seen that page you referenced before, but it is correct in that the
only licence you can be confident applies to any LO source is the LGPL. I
suspect that page will be updated when we're confident that all the legacy code
has been rebased against Apache. And when that will be I don't know, because I
think LO contains chunks of code that Apache aren't planning to audit or release
... oops ... (and we can't, because we don't have the information to check that
it was Oracle code, and we can't relicence it anyway because Oracle gave the
code to Apache, not us :-(

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )