decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Is World Government Evil? | 245 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Is World Government Evil?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 17 2013 @ 01:51 AM EDT
which is why the Subject line says World Government.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

World Government probably would be evil
Authored by: cricketjeff on Friday, May 17 2013 @ 07:06 AM EDT
But it isn't needed to make national taxation work.

All it requires is for each national tax authority to act reasonably (yeah I
know, fat chance!). Essentially they should say that all business activity here
is taxed at x% and that tax paid to a relevant government is an allowable
expense. The company then only has to show that they have paid tax at y% already
and so are only liable for tax at x-y%.

The current practice is for a large multinational to claim to be based in a low
tax jurisdiction, but employ there staff where the work really needs to be done,
then do 0.01% of the work at their notional headquarters and walk away
laughing.



---
There is nothing in life that doesn't look better after a good cup of tea.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )