decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
hackathon bah... | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
To delete the word mark...
Authored by: kjs on Monday, May 13 2013 @ 04:02 PM EDT
yes, and there's no need to lawyer up as it would be the case in the US. Once
you filed the form and provided the reasons/prior art the German patent office
takes care of the rest. All your lawyers would do is eat your money.
The same is for patents. My company just had one overturned as someone filed
such a form and provided so far unknown prior art. All they did was filing and
paying the few Euros.

---
not f'd, you won't find me on farcebook

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

To delete the word mark...
Authored by: mschmitz on Monday, May 13 2013 @ 04:12 PM EDT
I concur - it appears whoever translated the original news bit wasn't properly
speaking US English Legalese (tm). In all likelihood it would not have been a
native English speaker.

Or was it a case of Google Translate ? :-)

I had to look closer through the h-online news feed to even find the report.
Definitely looks like a sleazy attempt to capitalize on a tech scene the company
does not really understand (they are more into 'scene' than 'tech' it seems -
not certain this pun even makes sense in English). When it blew up in their
face, they even tried to get the CCC to help them out of the mess. Priceless.

By the way - they initially _did_ ask for license fees to the tune of EUR 2500 a
pop.

Seriously: If you find they do not follow through with the nullification, I am
certain many German citizens would support some form of petition to the patent
and trademark office. Looks like there's a fakebook group up and running
already. What's next on the to-be-trademarked list? Installfest? Debconf? Summer
of Code? I'll ask a few fellow compatriots still residing there...

-- mschmitz

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

the word mark, then and now
Authored by: IANALitj on Monday, May 13 2013 @ 10:27 PM EDT
I was working on mainframes at the time, but the term "word mark" was
an important one in computer usage a half century ago.

The wikipedia article on the IBM 1401 quotes the assertion "In all, by the
mid-1960s nearly half of all computer systems in the world were 1401-type
systems."

One of the characteristics of the 1401 architecture was that it had 8 bits for
every memory location, including a parity bit. One of these bits was called the
"word mark."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

hackathon bah...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 14 2013 @ 01:24 PM EDT
Who cares. Hackathons are abusive ploys, ie. let's reduce the once venerable
profession of engineering to a sporting event where the winners are rarely
adequately compensated and the losers certainly not adequately compensated...
ignoring all semblance of good manufacturing practice in the meantime.

How about instead of whining about a trivial and idiotic IP issue you worry
about a legitimate labor issue?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )