|
|
|
| Authored by: Ian Al on Wednesday, May 15 2013 @ 01:26 AM EDT |
I Wikied the Galaxy Nexus and Wikipedia confirmed my thought that the Nexus is a
joint product with Google.
Since it is formally a joint product and is, in the main, unmodified Android, I
would have thought it opened the door to Google being enjoined with the case.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 15 2013 @ 01:37 AM EDT |
Thanks for the link PJ. And for the braying masses who are afraid to read pdfs,
Samsung recently released its
newest smartphone, the Galaxy S4,
which began shipping in late April 2013. Based on Apple’s analysis of the
Galaxy S4,
Apple has concluded that it is an infringing device and accordingly
intends to move for leave to add the Galaxy S4 as an
infringing product.
Upon the grant of such motion, Apple will eliminate (without prejudice) one of
the Accused Products
named herein, so that it will continue to accuse only 22
products of infringement at this stage of the litigation. [emphasis
added]
Footnote 1 to Apple
Inc.'s List of Accused Products [ie. products
Apple accuses] Pursuant to Court Order of April 24, 2013.
Case5:12-cv-00630-
LHK Document514
So both GSM-Arena and fosspatents
accurately reported from the court document a part that was interesting to them,
and should
be to us too. But from our point of view this is merely Apple's
statement of its intent to move for the inclusion of S4 on the list, and the
removal of some unspecified other product. In the
(more or less) words of Ken
White (Popehat) the wheels are grinding, oh so slowly, but they are
grinding.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Sheesh indeed! - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 15 2013 @ 03:20 AM EDT
- Sheesh indeed! - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 15 2013 @ 05:50 PM EDT
- Re: the braying masses - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 15 2013 @ 01:57 PM EDT
|
|
|
|
