Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

you mean stacked invalidness ? | 709 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

you mean stacked invalidness ?

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 14 2013 @ 06:15 AM EDT

Maybe impressive as a deterent.
But it would also add complexity.
It would be more nice if there could be a single deveStating.

In the line of Keep It Simple.
Then again, a lot of things just arn't.
( 135 just got a meaning on its own now, just like 42 )

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Stacked invalidness = not necessary to deny - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 14 2013 @ 12:34 PM EDT

YES! I've said that software patents are invalid for a dozen different reasons

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 17 2013 @ 03:57 PM EDT

And someone reading this collection of opinions will find several of those
reasons.

Software patents should be going DOWN, now that so many of the different reasons
why they are invalid are available as precedent.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )