decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
sorry let me clarify | 709 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
You got it 100% backward -- not exactly
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 01:40 AM EDT
What he referred to was the "great American dream." He did not say at
all (and does not seem to mean) that the dream was well founded in reality.

Indeed, it has been a dream that, as our manufacturing base rusts and our
exports of actual goods dwindle and our imports increase, that it would be
possible to export "intellectual property" instead and make everybody
keep paying for it. Why else would we have constant attempts to get everybody
else to align their patent systems with ours and to sign treaties which would
make all the other countries commit themselves to respect our "intellectual
property" just as if it were their own? It isn't just Hollywood behind TPP
and all those other treaties. Patents are involved, too.

Now, clearly, whether or not such a tactic has any viability or even any actual
foundation in national interest is another question.

You are absolutely correct to point out that the patent system gone wild has
caused incredible damage. But the previous post is far from praising the policy
when it refers to a dream.

What is behind the dream is a fantasy that everything is invented in the US
which is the natural leader of the world. In short, it is hubris.

Another example of this mentality at work can easily be recalled, not exactly
related to patents. A few years ago, a law was passed against the export of
encryption software and it was attempted to suppress the free dissemination of
cryptographic research. We all remember how well that turned out. The effect was
not to deprive others of progress in cryptography at all. No, the result was to
encourage the movement of research and the production of related software
offshore. Brilliant move.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

sorry let me clarify
Authored by: thorpie on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 02:58 PM EDT
If I understand correctly it is the case that all software patents issued to date, and more, are invalid.

is this a correct statement?

Which means that to make currently issued invalid patents valid a retrospective law change would be needed.

Is his a correct statement? I would presume and hope that attaining retrospective legislation would be very difficult.

So the whole American economic dream blueprint of America being the brains and having the rest of the world the lowly paid manufacturers has just come crashing down.

Is this a correct conclusion? If it is just how large an impact will it have on America's economy going forward?

---
The memories of a man in his old age are the deeds of a man in his prime - Floyd, Pink

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )