|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 10:57 PM EDT |
| Got any evidence for that? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 01:34 AM EDT |
You really don't get it. At the end of the day a computer is
just an adding and subtracting machine. At its most primitive
level this is all a CPU does.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 04:42 AM EDT |
One reason I bring this up is that there will be rather large living
neural nets connected to computers, and these will be used as workers. I see
adding such aids to living neural nets as the equivalent of normal prosthetics
added to a person (or animal for that matter) to repair/enable a more normal
life.
The way most modern large neural networks are connected to
most computers these days is through earplugs, or so a walk down town on an
average day teaches me.
A stimulus-response associative processor - which is
the best Big Large Acronym I could find - such as the brain, is a fact of nature
much like the sun, the moon, the seas, rain, predators, prey, bowel functions,
etc.
Which means, if computers could be developed to emulate neural networks
very precisely, or even be neural networks themselves, they would be
facts of nature as copied by humans, and thus themselves ineligible for patents,
however much the individual aspects of such a grand design might themselves be
patentable human-designed manufacturing processes and inventions.
Wesley Parish [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 10:38 AM EDT |
All CURRENT computers are just a glorified calculator though.
Yep. and so will all FUTURE computers be!
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 12:30 PM EDT |
You are trying to claim that purely mental processes, carried out in a human
brain, are patentabke???[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Nope. - Authored by: jesse on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 06:13 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 13 2013 @ 12:28 PM EDT |
Turing complete, nothing more, nothing less.
And people know quite well how a biological neurons work, a network of
biological neurons behaves like a neural net of the type we create by code.
A huge network, with very complex neurons. But just as humans taking too long to
perform a calculation isn't reason to claim that it's not math, one needing a
too large neural net isn't either.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 18 2013 @ 04:44 AM EDT |
| A computer is a mechanical and electronic expression of some complex
equations
in Boolean Algebra.
It is driven by numbers ( instructions) and it operates
on numbers (data).
What's patentable about all that? What is patentable
about any of the parts
of the whole? It's all maths, not just the
software.
Anon Y; Mous. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
