|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:43 PM EDT |
| . [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Laomedon on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 06:35 PM EDT |
Radar was a character in "Mash",Randall Ray Rader (born April 21,
1949) is the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 05:20 AM EDT |
Just a minor little technical niggle, but it would probably confuse the
legislators even more:
What they don't understand yet, but
we'll keep explaining until they do, is that all computers are like that. None
of them do anything but 1s and 0s...
That is true of all [modern]
digital computers. If you consider the first "computer" designed by
Charles Babbage, his difference engine
designed to replace the fallible human "computers", along with its proposed
successor the Analytical Engine (a
general purpose computer), they worked with the ten digits 0-9.
Going
further, considering Alan Turing's Turing Machine computers
can manipulate any alphabet of symbols, not just 1 and 0. Digital, with its use
of multiple binary digits to encode data, has become so engrained, that things
like Babbage's Engine, where each "store" can be in 10 different states, not
just 2, have been forgotten/ignored.
cm [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 09:34 AM EDT |
| maybe blind, but I can't find your update [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: achurch on Sunday, May 12 2013 @ 03:52 AM EDT |
PJ, it looks like your last update accidentally removed most of the decision
text. For me, the article ends with:
CHARLES W. SHIFLEY,
Banner & Witcoff, LTD., of Chicago, Illinois, for amicus curiae The
Intellectual Property Law Associati [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: hardmath on Monday, May 13 2013 @ 12:30 PM EDT |
Here's a
working link to the day's crop of
three unanimous Supreme Court decisions,
leading off with the
Monsanto victory.
[frowny face]
---
Rosser's
trick: "For every proof of me, there is a shorter proof of my negation". [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
