decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not all corporations support software patents | 709 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Your perception is right ...
Authored by: webster on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 09:40 AM EDT
.

-----------"Google has been a disappointment to me in this
respect. Though Google employees have come out strongly at
times against software patents - it was never clear that
they speak for the company. Indeed I have seen Google the
corporation remain mute where there have been opportunities
to speak out against software patents in general. I have
hypothesized that they cannot make sweeping statements
denouncing software patents while at the same time defending
themselves from trolls via pressing the attack with their
own software patents. "------------

It is always true that whatever you say can be used against
you. This does not only apply to people arrested.

Google can't attack software patents in general and then
defend themselves with patent counterclaims in a patent
lawsuit, or file retaliatory lawsuits, with their own
patents. They would have to admit that they said all, AND
THEIR OWN, software patents are invalid and shouldn't have
been issued. This would be a losing posture.

.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not all corporations support software patents
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 10:56 AM EDT
It would most likely be better for Google and for the rest of the world if
software
patents were completely abolished (substitute any company for Google
that isn't
a patent troll). But without doubt, it would be very bad for Google
and slightly
good for the rest of the world if _only_ Google gave up their
software patents, so
it isn't going to happen.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Conundrum
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 11:10 AM EDT

First on the topic of Microsoft and Apple:

    Absolutely, do not trust them - they've shown they are more then willing to have the only software patents if they can arrange it and they are more then willing to use them aggressively
On the topic of Google:
    The great conundrum - how do you fight a Law you don't believe in, yet also defend yourself against the Law while the Law is still in place?
It's possible in those closed door meetings Corporations have with Politicians that Google is saying to get rid of all software patents and that they are willing to give up theirs to have a clear Law.

Are they? I don't know.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )