|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 09:06 PM EDT |
why the press is dancing round in circles saying that New Zealand is preventing
the patenting of software. The
Supplementary Order Paper reported back to the House from a
Select Committee is for all practical purposes the same as
when everybody
noticed the words as such might allow enough wiggle room for some lawyers
to argue the patentability
of some software. If you look at the linked Paper
you will see a wedge already hammered into that wiggle room. The
Examples offered beneath para 10A(3) altho' not part of the law, attempt
to define what sort of software can be
patented and how. Maybe the CAFC could
learn a trick or two from New Zealand.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 12:35 AM EDT |
Th New Zealand gov't already removed the words "as such" from the
proposed legislation.
See the news article posted by anon, in the Off-topic thread of the
previous groklaw story [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|