decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Fair enough, though read on | 709 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Fair enough, though read on
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 13 2013 @ 04:58 PM EDT
Thanks for replying.

I agree that if you've actually got sensitive stuff on the drive, physical
destruction is still your best bet. (Some data from experiments I've performed:
a .45 ACP FMJ bullet will put some interesting curves into a 3.5" hard
drive's alloy frame but won't do much to the platters, whereas a 7.62x39 bullet
puts a nice clean hole through the whole shebang, so is probably better for this
purpose.)

However, I would hate for people to confuse the two topics and think that
overwriting the partition table (as described in the ancestral posts)
"wipes" the drive. dd would still be all you'd need to recover almost
all the data on the drive, even after repartitioning and formatting. Overwriting
the entire drive would make it very difficult (maybe impossible) to recover
anything, but doing this with /dev/random wouldn't seem to offer any benefit to
using /dev/zero, and would take far longer so it seems impractical. (I don't
know about your system, but iceweasel sometimes stalls on me when trying to get
just a few K from /dev/random for https connections.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )