decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Encouraging Indeed | 709 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Encouraging Indeed
Authored by: lnuss on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:57 PM EDT
It does initially sound encouraging, though I'm still expecting a catch
somewhere -- it's too good to be true.

But I'm hoping...

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Totally Sweet - my heart actually skipped a beat
Authored by: xtifr on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 05:01 PM EDT

Now here's crossing all the bones in my body that can be crossed in the hopes this makes it's way to the Supremes and the Supremes confirm!
Even if it isn't appealed, or the Supremes refuse to hear it, it's still great news. One whole circuit with this precedent is a lot better than none. And especially the Federal Circuit, since that's where patent cases are generally going to end up. This is already about as close as it's possible to be to a universal rule without the Supremes' official ruling.

On the other hand, I hope you're right, because that would one step closer to fulfilling one of the predictions I made for 2013 on a "post random predictions to pretend you have psychic powers" thread on another forum. :)

(The remaining step would be for the SCOTUS to rule against the patent on narrow grounds that suggest that software is not generally patentable, but stop just short of making that clear for once and for all. If they do that, I'll have a better claim to psychic powers than many people who actually claim to have psychic powers, since I'll be batting 50%, and my other prediction is pretty likely to come true too.) :)

---
Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for it makes them soggy and hard to light.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

My favorite line so far
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 05:26 PM EDT

At its most basic, a computer is just a calculator capable of performing mental steps faster than a human could. Unless the claims require a computer to perform operations that are not merely accelerated calculations, a computer does not itself confer patent eligibility.
I dearly hope the Supremes get to examine that concept for clarification. Of course, I further hope they agree.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )