decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Don't overstate the breadth | 709 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Don't overstate the breadth
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 15 2013 @ 06:39 PM EDT
This isn't a difficult concept.

Think about a printing press, with movable type. Patenting a press, an improved
press, a specialized type font--all valid.

Taking an existing press, and an existing font, and patenting the act of
printing a page containing some particular sequence of symbols, by putting
together items from that font into a forme--is insane. It's

But that's what Judge Rader does with computers. Would he say, "A printing
press doesn't print anything but smudges until the plate is inserted"?
Would he say "a copier doesn't copy anything but glare unless an image is
placed on the glass plate"? A chainsaw doesn't cut anything unless the
starter cord is pulled--or until the blade makes contact with a log"? Maybe
a chainsaw that cuts oak is a completely different machine from a chainsaw that
cuts Texas cheerleaders. Or a calculator doesn't calculate anything until you
press the buttons. Nobody is that out of touch with reality!

Ah, but bring a computer in, and suddenly we're in a whole different universe. A
COMPUTER, you must know, is a whole different machine when it's processing the
objects which it was designed from the beginning to process.

What Judge Rader doesn't understand is -- there is no such thing as installing a
program on a computer. You can, if you wish, copy files into a storage medium
with a high-speed connection to your processor. You can also copy files into a
storage medium which is on another continent, and has no direct connection to
your computer at all. So long as the computer can access its instructions (one
bit at a time), it doesn't matter where the file is. The computer is performing
EXACTLY the same computation.

What some people call "installation" is simply caching information
where it can be accessed more rapidly. It's completely unnecessary to the
computation, and it's completely irrelevant to any conceivable concept of
computating machinery.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )