decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
"Naked" shorting is illegal everywhere | 709 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
If you have the cash, buying does trap short sellers
Authored by: ailuromancy on Saturday, May 11 2013 @ 02:36 AM EDT

Share prices are what people are prepared to buy and sell for. If the most desperate buyer will not meet the price of the most desperate seller, there are no trades. At some point either a buyer increases his offer to get the cheapest available shares or a seller reduces his price to match the biggest available offers. After such a deal, the gap between offers to buy and sell returns, but centred at a new price.

Pretend I decide to sell shares I do not have. I sell to the the buyers with the largest offers until they are satisfied then sell at the new lower price. They say 'the cheque is in the post', I say 'the share certificates are in the post' and everyone is happy.

Existing investors see the gap between offers to buy and sell increasing. Perhaps they get nervous and offer to sell at a lower price. If not, a fake news story may be needed to prod them into action. I need the investors to drop their price below what I paid. That way, I can spend some of that cheque in the post on real shares that I can actually put in the post so I do not get caught.

This is an effective strategy but can go horribly wrong. Pretend you guess what is going on, and have a huge pile of money in the bank. You wait for offers to sell to fall almost to the price I want, then you start buying. If you think I am getting nervous, you buy faster to exhaust any offer I might be about to take. You put your shares up for sale at a hefty price. The other investors start to wonder what you know, and increase their prices to match.

Now I have a choice: sell my car so I can afford to buy at your price, or admit I was selling shares I did not have. You let me sweat for a bit, then increase your price. To get out of trouble now, I have to sell my house. If you are feeling nasty, you increase your price again. Buying my way out now costs more than I have - the solution is obvious: sell more shares I do not have, use the money to buy my way out of your trap and pray I do not get caught the same way twice in a row.

In reality, defending against a short seller is difficult. You have to spot what is happening really fast. You have to have lots of money in the bank. You have to keep that money tied up in shares until I break. If you get too greedy, I might just take the money and run - after all, I have cash from all those imaginary shares I just sold.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Naked" shorting is illegal everywhere
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 17 2013 @ 04:19 PM EDT
It consists of selling stock you don't have. When the time comes for delivery
(three days after sale), if you don't have the stock, you just committed fraud
and need to go to prison. Occasionally people actually do, but Goldman Sachs is
usually above the law.

Proper shorting consists of BORROWING stock and selling it.

This can also bankrupt you, if you are suddenly unable to find the stock to
return to the lender when the lender demands it back, but it won't put you in
prison.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )