decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
"Right to injunctions"? | 86 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections
Authored by: clicky_maker on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:52 AM EDT
No one is perfect

---
505640

[ Reply to This | # ]

Newspicks
Authored by: clicky_maker on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:53 AM EDT
For the rest of the world.

---
505640

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off Topic
Authored by: clicky_maker on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:54 AM EDT
Make sure it is off topic.

---
505640

[ Reply to This | # ]

Comes goes Here
Authored by: clicky_maker on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:57 AM EDT
There it is for all the world to see, I clicked the wrong reply button.
My apologies.
How much of Comes is left?

---
505640

[ Reply to This | # ]

Blackberry Tells the Federal Circuit Judge Posner Got It Wrong Re No Injunctions for FRAND Patents in Apple v. Motorola ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 06:12 AM EDT
Groklaw should sue BB for copyright infringement! Those
arguments constitute non-literal copying of Groklaw's
position!

Now seriously, it's refreshing to see the actual players go
through the same conclusions as we GL readers.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Blackberry Tells the Federal Circuit Judge Posner Got It Wrong Re No Injunctions for FRAND Patents in Apple v. Motorola ~pj
Authored by: cassini2006 on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 08:32 AM EDT
Likewise, a putative SEP licensee could refuse to license essential patents to the SEP patent holder, demand abusively high rates on its patents, or seek an injunction against the SEP holder in an attempt either to evade the putative licensee’s obligation to fairly compensate the SEP holder or to force the SEP holder to exit the market.

Traditionally, the major players would enter into cross-licensing agreements, and no one was too concerned about the exact terms of FRAND. Now, Apple and Microsoft want to license FRAND patents for free, while blocking competition with non-SEP patents. Anti-competitive and opportunistic behaviour at its worst.

[ Reply to This | # ]

"Right to injunctions"?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 10:10 AM EDT
There is no such thing as a "right to injunctions". There is a right
to royalties, and where this right is breached, relief may be sought. But just
what kind of relief may be available or granted or be considered appropriate or
inappropriate or required for making compliance the best option: that's more a
matter of case law than canonical law. It's not a question about what rights a
party has, but rather what measures are commensurate to get its rights
respected.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Happy Mother's day PJ (and all other moms here)
Authored by: ilde on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 01:37 PM EDT
Best regards

[ Reply to This | # ]

Blackberry Is Canadian
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 12 2013 @ 01:28 AM EDT
But Blackberry is a Canadian company and the others are American. Guess which
way the American courts rule?
Anyone remember the $600 Million Blackberry had to pay for 'violating' a patent
that was ruled invalid before the court case was even finished?
pgmer6809

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )