Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

on a purely technical level, probably true | 393 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

on a purely technical level, probably true

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 04:08 AM EDT

And Apple was so concerned about the accuracy of the patent that they pointed
this out to them at the time, before, and not /after/, they sued Samsung and
were awarded damages on the incorrect USPTO interpretation of claim 19?

The impression I get is that Apple have come up with this interpretation to
narrow the claims and still get claim 19 valid, but in doing so make Samsung
fall outside its scope, and so could/would/should not be able to sue over it.

> "While Lira's snap-to-column function incidentally achieves the visual
result of
> translating in the second direction "until the area beyond the edge of
the electronic
> document is no longer displayed" (only when the width of the column
corresponds to
> the width of the display)..."

that tells me that the edge of display is merely a special condition of the
generalised column, and as such is covered by lira.

cm

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )