|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 01:08 PM EDT |
Apple did not narrow their claim instruction. They merely pointed out words in
the claim that the Examiner was overlooking.
Lira was the closest art the Patent Office could find. When it became clear to
the Examiner that Lira did not disclose or make obvious the subject matter of
claim 19, the Examiner appropriately concluded that claim 19 was not anticipated
or made obvious by the prior art.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 08:02 PM EDT |
Surely this is fixed by simple geometry? Say we have a line 200 units long ...
it overlies a 200 unit 'window' when the centre is at 100 window units, or the
upper limit is at 200 window units or the lower margin is at 0 window units?
Code for the centre is elegant and symmetrical (including 'diagonal' offsets for
2-D extension), code for the ends involves two conditions, is clunky, inelegant
and UGLY.
Does Apple really code for outer margins? really?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- geometry ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 06:16 AM EDT
- geometry ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 12:33 AM EDT
|
|
|
|