Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Prove what? | 393 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Prove what?

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 10:58 AM EDT

I still read from PJ's article:
"Apple's Statements to the Examiner Limiting Claim 19."
and the discussion after that as if there were a change in the scope of Claim
19.
Especially as Apple claims that there are other ways to get the same visual
effect. (and how true it is, one can't count all the ways, which make software
patents rather silly).

What interview are you referring to? I can't seem to find it, but that might be
my old rheumy eyes. I think I am too old to dwelve into legalese whether
originating from American PTO or Courts. It is to many words and to little
reason.

I can not see much sense in all this rush to litigate everything it only results
in fat lawyers and who need them.

Cheers!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thats a summary of what Samsung alleges, not what actually happened. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 11:58 AM EDT
- Thats a summary of what Samsung alleges, not what actually happened. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 12:37 PM EDT
  - Thats a summary of what Samsung alleges, not what actually happened. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 12:52 PM EDT
    - Thats a summary of what Samsung alleges, not what actually happened. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 01:09 PM EDT
    - Precisely! You hit it! - Authored by: cpeterson on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 07:16 PM EDT
      - Even if that were true? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 01:55 AM EDT
        Even if that were true? - Authored by: PJ on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 03:55 AM EDT
        Even if that were true, why didnt Samsung point out the overlooked phrase? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 04:44 AM EDT
        Inattentive lawyers - Authored by: NigelWhitley on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 08:18 AM EDT
        Don't be obtuse - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 09:50 AM EDT
        Don't be obtuse! - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 02:37 PM EDT
        All the more reason - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 03:22 PM EDT
        Never assume that lawyers are engineers.. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 03:41 PM EDT
        Always assume that patent lawyers are engineers.. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 07:28 AM EDT
        While true: that only highlights a bigger problem - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 11:56 AM EDT
        While true: that only highlights a bigger problem - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 12:05 PM EDT
        While true: that only highlights a bigger problem - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 12:41 PM EDT
        You are correct, I found it and pasted it in a new thread below. Please read it. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 01:40 PM EDT
        You never answered my question. - Authored by: myNym on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 01:44 PM EDT
        You are correct, I found it and pasted it in a new thread below. Please read it. - Authored by: PJ on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:26 PM EDT
        What I'm saying (not "mine" - I don't presume to speak for others) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 03:36 PM EDT
        What I'm saying (not "mine" - I don't presume to speak for others) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 03:48 PM EDT
        Given the decided lack of citations to support "Samsung is Wrong" - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 04:07 PM EDT
        Given the decided lack of citations to support "Samsung is Wrong" - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 04:27 PM EDT
        Markman hearing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 04:51 PM EDT
        Markman hearing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:26 PM EDT
        Markman hearing - Authored by: PJ on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:28 PM EDT
        Markman hearing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:41 PM EDT
        If only you were acute... - Authored by: NigelWhitley on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 05:14 PM EDT
        You are certainly blunt. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 09:40 PM EDT
        I really need to use those irony tags - Authored by: NigelWhitley on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 07:36 AM EDT
        I really need to use those irony tags - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 08:43 AM EDT
        I really need to use those irony tags - Authored by: NigelWhitley on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 10:20 AM EDT
        I really need to use those irony tags - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 11:12 AM EDT
        Astonishing lack of what? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 01:45 PM EDT
        Funny the same piece is posted... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 03:24 PM EDT
        Astonishing lack of what? - Authored by: PJ on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 04:55 PM EDT
        Astonishing lack of what? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:15 PM EDT
        Astonishing lack of what? - Authored by: PJ on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:06 PM EDT
        Astonishing lack of what? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 12 2013 @ 05:18 PM EDT
        Understanding of the process - you even quoted it... - Authored by: NigelWhitley on Saturday, July 13 2013 @ 06:34 PM EDT
        Understanding of the process - you even quoted it... - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, July 13 2013 @ 08:10 PM EDT
        The one that are incapable...... - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 14 2013 @ 06:56 AM EDT
        Lol - you're funny - Authored by: NigelWhitley on Sunday, July 14 2013 @ 07:08 AM EDT
        - you're sad - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 14 2013 @ 07:32 AM EDT
        Lol - you're funny - Authored by: PJ on Sunday, July 14 2013 @ 08:50 AM EDT
        Don't be obtuse - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 05:21 PM EDT
That's the Humpty Dumpty Defense - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 04:26 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )