|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 04:16 PM EDT |
The claim in question is presented below. I have used --- to bracket the
important bit as I find successfully using HTML here tedious and next to
impossible.
19. (original) A device, comprising:
a touch screen display;
one or more processors;
memory; and one or more programs,
wherein the one or more programs are stored in the memory and configured to be
executed by the one or more processors, the programs including:
instructions for displaying a first portion of an electronic document;
instructions for detecting a movement of an object on or near the touch screen
display;
instructions for translating the electronic document displayed on the touch
screen display in a first direction to display a second portion of the
electronic document,
wherein the second portion is different from the first portion, in response to
detecting the movement;
instructions for displaying an area beyond an edge of the electronic document
and displaying a third portion of the electronic document, wherein the third
portion is smaller than the first portion, in response to the edge of the
electronic document being reached while translating the electronic document in
the first direction while the object is still detected on or near the touch
screen display; and
instructions for translating the electronic document in a second direction
--------until the area beyond the edge of the electronic document is no longer
displayed ----- to display a fourth portion of the electronic document, wherein
the fourth portion is different from the first portion, in response to detecting
that the object is no longer on or near the touch screen display.
The claimed device includes very particular instructions, instructions for
translating UNTIL THE AREA BEYOND THE EDGE OF THE ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IS NO
LONGER DISPLAYED.
All Apple did recently is point that out to the examiner. They did not change
the scope of the claim by so doing. It was always there.
I hope that is citation enough for you.
Forgive me for once again assuming people discussing a patent had read the
claims.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|