|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 09:50 AM EDT |
The claim is there for all to read. When charged with infringement, the first
thing one does is read the claims, parse them word for word and look for an
argument that ones products don't include as many aspects as possible.
Apparently, Samsung read the claims and decided NOT to make an argument that
their products did not include instructions for testing the position of the
edge.
I'm sure the argument Apple made was something like, see how the Samsung
products work? That looks like it has to infringe our claim 19 to us and we so
allege. At that point Samsung is free to say, no we don't, see, here's the
related portion of our code, it doesn't test the position of the edge, instead
it counts "mississippies". When it gets to 4 mississipies it assumes
you are at the edge of the document and stops.
Apparently, they didn't do that. I wonder why....[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|