|
| Authored by: eric76 on Tuesday, July 09 2013 @ 06:26 PM EDT |
Second paragraph
Meanwhile, the reexamination process
continued at the USPTO, with Apple getting them to overrule their earlier final
determination that claim 19 of the '381 patent, the claim at issue in this
litigation, was not valid due to prior art. And here comes Samsung with the
incredible news that it just learned on July 12th that during the most
recent phase of the reexamination process at the USPTO, Apple narrowed its
patent so much to get it to survive the process that Samsung's products no
longer infringe (which Samsung never thought they did
anyhow):
Should be June 12. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 09 2013 @ 07:01 PM EDT |
Not strictly a correction but the entry for 2320 contains a phone number. I
think they've normally been removed.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 09 2013 @ 07:20 PM EDT |
... learned on July 12th that during ...
...Tab 10.1(WiFi), Mesmerize and Vibrant. Dkt. 2271. This motion is based on
"newly discovered evidence" because Samsung learned from PTO records
made publicly available on June 12, 2013, ...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: ChrisP on Tuesday, July 09 2013 @ 07:26 PM EDT |
In the list of filings at the end of the article, the links for 2323 point to
ApplevSamsung-2317.pdf and ApplevSamsung-2317-1.pdf. The links in the text of
the article are correct though.
---
Gravity sucks, supernovae blow![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 08:57 AM EDT |
There is lots of repeated text in the lots of repeated text
in the sidebar newspick. Some of it repeats more than once.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 12:05 PM EDT |
| MSS2 [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 12:07 PM EDT |
| "because millions are at stake", millions -> billions... [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 12:11 PM EDT |
| Where does it all end...? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 15 2013 @ 12:42 PM EDT |
File not found:
We're sorry, but we can't find the page you have requested. Please feel free to
check the main page or the search page.
I don't see a final ruling on claim construction. Is there one? Is it in the
missing document?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
