|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 10 2013 @ 02:42 PM EDT |
There you have got a core symptom which points to the nature of the problem. A
logical, well ordered system would not enable such to arise.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 05:45 AM EDT |
I know, I know... maybe they could check the patent database to see if anyone
has come up with an ingenious method by which one party could register interest
in events on particular items, based on some sort of identifier, and then
register that they were no longer interested at a later date. During the period
where they were interested, the could be informed if any events happened on that
particular keyed identifier. I wonder what it might be called?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubSub
Keeping track of _thousands_ of cases. Oh the horrors. Oh the BIG DATA[tm].
Better map-reduce that stuff.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 11 2013 @ 05:11 PM EDT |
>the PTO could try to keep track of them all and try to update every court
considering each case and patent under examination
There are a number of firms whose sole business is to track court cases for
their clients. Sign up with one of them, and you will receive several reminders
for every filing date, court date, and other aspects of the trial that are
crucial for you, the client.
> but if they fail who is responsible?
If having a single point of failure is apt to have an adverse consequence, then
hire two or three firms to provide the same data.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|