decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
for Prenda, disbarment might be pointless | 206 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I was hoping for EM-barment, as in Jail for those perps..n/t (Christenson)
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 04:23 PM EDT
(Christenson)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

for Prenda, disbarment might be pointless
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 09:37 PM EDT
They already have a history of filing cases where they aren't licensed to
practice, via clueless greedy proxies. And remember, Ingenuity, Livewire, AF
Holdings, et al, are just the shells that have been identified so far. I'm
betting they already have others in place that just haven't turned up yet. I'd
bet a couple of them even formed the same day certain dismissal motions were
being filed. Shuffle a few names, keep the hot ones out of sight for a while,
and continue as usual. Just a minor inconvenience. That's the mentality I sense
from these crooks.

Not only do they think they're so much smarter than the rest of the world, they
think that entitles them to wealth, and that everyone else (all us stoopid
people) should pay.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )