|
| Authored by: rocky on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 06:34 PM EDT |
| Yeah, their request is actually reasonable, and that is what has me nervous. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 06:37 PM EDT |
SCOg v IBM Court rules:
IBM is guilty of $5 owed to
SCOg
SCOg is guilty of $50 Million owed to IBM
Bankruptcy
Court Rules:
IBM owes SCOg $5 - pay up
Since bankruptcy stays
any debt SCOg owes, the $50 Million debt is cancelled
With what we've
seen in the bankruptcy court, I wouldn't at all be surprised if the above wasn't
the concept behind the plan.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 07:11 PM EDT |
Only thing I can think of (well, that's me) is SCO thinks IBM doesn't want to
spend money litigating this. It was false 10 years ago, and it's false now. SCO
never learns.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: BJ on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:14 PM EDT |
in the absence of pay?
bjd
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 09:28 PM EDT |
Apparently he is in charge of their creative department.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
