|
|
|
| Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, April 30 2013 @ 07:48 PM EDT |
RK and Google may improve the ability to provide answers that are responsive by
weeding out stuff unrelated to the question. This is not the same as providing
accurate answers.
I also think that analyzing text to provide more responsive answers is a
necessary step. They can't be accurate if they can't be responsive in the first
place.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 30 2013 @ 08:01 PM EDT |
What you are missing is that for Wikipedia, there is no such thing as objective
truth. The only thing that exists is the subjective "this is how the world
should be".
This is why Wikipedia is useful for determining what people wish was true, even
when that "truth" is demonstrably false, and no set of circumstances
or logic exists in which it might be objectively valid.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 01 2013 @ 02:36 AM EDT |
I had a quick look at the Wikipedia article on Groklaw, and can't immediately
see anything looking wrong or unfair. Can you be specific about what you think
it says or does not say that would mislead general readers?
Brian Chandler[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
