|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 30 2013 @ 08:07 PM EDT |
with the expectation of loosing money
Please point
out a single incident where anyone but you speaks of the "expectation of loosing
money".
If you can not, then - in my humble opinion - you are fabricating
a dispute. Whether it's deliberate, only you can say for
sure.
Additionally, you're contradicting your own statement with evidence
that you yourself present. To paraphrase what you said about IBM:
IBM is
not evidence of a for-profit company giving away their patent with the
expectation of loosing money. IBM makes their patents available for zero dollar
cost in such areas as the Linux Kernel because IBM sells hardware with Linux as
the operating system. This allows IBM to generate profits by lessening other
expenses.
This - of course - is the exact opposite of what you are
insisting. It is what others - such as myself - are saying:
That one does
not have to have a monetary value intent behind a patent - or such intent behind
patentable technology that they do not patent - in order to have incentive to
innovate!
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
