decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Innovation will happen no matter the price | 211 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Innovation will happen no matter the price
Authored by: ukjaybrat on Monday, April 29 2013 @ 03:28 PM EDT
it's not that you would be less willing to patent the
device... you would patent it right away.

The problem is that you would be less willing to put up any
of your patents to a standard (because apparently those
licenses aren't even worth a penny).

Thus, everyone else out there trying to make teleportation
devices that don't want to buy a license from you would have
to come up with their own proprietary way of making the
device, which would in turn be incompatible with your
device. There would eventually be dozens of different
teleportation devices that can't be used with each other.

thus instead of dozens of different companies working toward
the same goal: making teleportation better, more efficient,
less bug prone, cheaper, faster, etc... you have dozens of
different companies reinventing the wheel because they all
have to do the same work independently, all because the
first guy didn't create a standard.

that help?

---
IANAL

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

For profit company dont donate patents to a standard and expect to loose money, prove they do.
Authored by: Kilz on Monday, April 29 2013 @ 03:37 PM EDT
Personally I think its common sense that people dont spend
money to develop patents and then dont expect to see a return
on that investment.
Since you seem to think that proof is required that profit is
a motive. Perhaps you would like to provide proof that it
isnt.
Please provide links to a for profit company that gave away
patented technology to a standards body with the hopes of
loosing all they invested in it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Yes you are wrong...sort of.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 30 2013 @ 01:23 PM EDT
If you already have the method for teleportation, you might go ahead and
implement it.

The thing is, most things don't just fall into your lap. In order to get a
method for teleportaion, one usually has to make an R&D investment. For the
sake of argument, lets say that costs 1 billion dollars.

Now, if on the first day you would sell your teleporter someone could buy one,
take it apart and start making copies for 200 bucks instead of the 50,000 you
would have to charge to earn back your investment, you will determine that you
could never make back your billion, let alone make a profit, because you would
be undercut in the market by copiers.

So, you would never "have a method of teleportation" in the first
place.


Everyone else would run the same calculation and come to the same conclusion, so
the world will never have teleportation, unless it falls in someones lap.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )