|
Authored by: foulis on Monday, April 29 2013 @ 05:25 PM EDT |
From chrissh Tue Jan 29 15:15:34 1991<br>
To: winperf<br>
Cc: richab<br>
Subject: Cross OS comparison priorities<br>
Date: Tue Jan 29 15:12:29 1991</p>
After talking with Davidcol, Davidw, Phil and Karl we have
decided that, in general, the consensus prioritizes our
competition in the following order of importance:</p>
PC/GEOS<br>
CUTTER (OS/2 1.3)<br>
MAC</p>
Based on this list, we will be focusing our efforts at
ascertaining where we stand against each Operating System.
</p>
The work, for the most part, is done on PC/GEOS. If you have
not read the paper by David Weise on PC/GEOS, let me know
and I will get you a copy. Other than a few isolated tests,
the report I sent to winperf on Jan 15 is the extent of our
comparison against PC/GEOS. The lack of any real apps
severely limits what we are able to do here.</p>
The remainder of the work on cross OS comparison will focus
on Cutter, and the MAC. We will be comparing Windows against
the MAC on the following hardware:</p>
Mac IIci<br>
25-MHz 68030 processor<br>
25-MHz 68882 coprocessor<br>
[?]MB planar memory<br>
Built-in video, 256 colors<br>
80MB SCSI hard disk</p>
IBM PS/2 70<br>
25-MHz 80386 processor<br>
25-MHz 80387 coprocessor<br>
640K conventional memory<br>
3328K extended memory<br>
8514 video, 256 colors<br>
110MB ESDI hard disk</p>
Windows against Cutter will be on the PS/2 70 above, as well
as a 16MHz PS/2 55sx.</p>
If you have any questions or comments, please let me know.
We will be acquiring the MAC machine ASAP.</p>
Thank you for your support....</p>
Mr p<br>
<p align=right>Plaintiff's
Exhibit<br><u>5227</u><br>Comes
V. Microsoft</p>
<p align=right>MS-PCA 2432702<br>CONFIDENTIAL</p>
<p align=right>EXH <u>90</u> Date
<u>11/02/01</u><br>Witness
<u>[signature]</u> SUSAN ZIELIE</p>
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Comes 5227 - Authored by: PJ on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 04:56 PM EDT
|
|
|
|