|
Authored by: sumzero on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 07:20 PM EDT |
you'd think that's the sort of thing microsoft's attorneys
would have provided to disprove motorola's claims regarding
the lack of negotiation. i don't see any mention of it in the
judge's ruling either, but that is quite long and i might have
missed it. please point to it if you think i have. thanks.
sum.zero
---
48. The best book on programming for the layman is "alice in wonderland"; but
that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.
alan j perlis[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 09:52 PM EDT |
You are following Microsoft's party line
that the opening offer was what the end
result would have been. It was an
opening offer, and the judge already ruled
that an opening offer doesn't have to be
a RAND rate, just so long as the eventual
license is.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mvs_tomm on Tuesday, April 30 2013 @ 02:37 PM EDT |
Where did that number come from? In order for Microsoft to have to pay 4
billion dollars in royalties at a rate of 2.25%, they would have to sell 175
billion dollars worth of phones. What's that, maybe 500 million phones a year?
Does anyone believe that Microsoft can sell that many of its phones?
Tom Marchant[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|