Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

probably the part where one party... | 352 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

probably the part where one party...

Authored by: sumzero on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 06:17 PM EDT

failed to participate in the required negotiation and instead
went to the courts, resulting in a non-negotiated and
arbitrary [based on non-relevant patent pools] valuation.

let's also remember that this party was already willfully
infringing the patents in question at the time.

sum.zero

---
48. The best book on programming for the layman is "alice in wonderland"; but
that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.

alan j perlis

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

probably the part where one party... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 07:30 PM EDT

In a First, Seattle Judge Sets RAND Rate in MS v. Motorola ~pj

Authored by: eric76 on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 08:13 PM EDT

You have your own personal meaning of "arbitrary" that I do not comprehend.

Perhaps you need a refresher course in vocabulary:

From Google:

ar·bi·trar·y
/ˈärbiˌtrerē/

Adjective
1. Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
2. (of power or a ruling body) Unrestrained and autocratic in the use of authority.

Synonyms
high-handed

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

In a First, Seattle Judge Sets RAND Rate in MS v. Motorola ~pj - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 27 2013 @ 08:14 AM EDT
- In a First, Seattle Judge Sets RAND Rate in MS v. Motorola ~pj - Authored by: eric76 on Saturday, April 27 2013 @ 01:45 PM EDT
  - In a First, Seattle Judge Sets RAND Rate in MS v. Motorola ~pj - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 27 2013 @ 03:06 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )