Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

In a First, Seattle Judge Sets RAND Rate in MS v. Motorola ~pj | 352 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

In a First, Seattle Judge Sets RAND Rate in MS v. Motorola ~pj

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 27 2013 @ 12:55 PM EDT

You obviously know nothing about how business works.

Bill big and negotiate downwards.

The first person to name a price is the loser.

Set your initial offer too low and you may wind up negotiating down to an even
lower price, when in fact the other party would in fact have been willing to pay
much more than the initial offer.

Not Microsoft, of course. But then when they have not gotten the prices they've
thought they should pay, they've had a nasty habit of just stealing it outright.
Google "Stacker Microsoft" if you don't believe me.

Now Microsoft seems to have added a new twist. Steal it and then run to court
and cry foul before the other party can sue.

-Celtic_hackr not logged in

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )