decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Ahh - misrepresentation | 352 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
what exactly does that have to do with your assertion...
Authored by: sumzero on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 06:11 PM EDT
that moto's offer was not frand compatible based on this
judge's valuation. also, how exactly does that ruling bar an
appeal of this ruling? details please.

sum.zero

---
48. The best book on programming for the layman is "alice in wonderland"; but
that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.

alan j perlis

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ahh - misrepresentation
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 06:24 PM EDT

Definition of misrepresentation as according to Merriam Webster:

to give a false or misleading representation of usually with an intent to deceive or be unfair [misrepresented the facts]

Using a previous appeal to indicate this ruling is settled and won't change.

I'd say that's deliberately misleading given:

    1) This case as a whole can still be appealed let alone this one ruling!
and
    2) The Case is a long logistical way from the appeal being requested of the Supremes (who may or may not choose to hear the appeal).

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Appeal's Court has already decided????
Authored by: DMalone780 on Sunday, April 28 2013 @ 09:57 PM EDT
And of course the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals does not have the distinction of being one of the most over turned circuit, if not the most overturned Circuit court in the Nation, right? to quote findlaw.com
"The good news for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals? There's little difference between the circuit's traditional and full reversal rates. The bad news? The Ninth Circuit is the most reversed circuit by either measure. BNA reports the Ninth Circuits traditional and full reversal rates as 79.4 percent and 68.9 percent, respectively."

blogs.findlaw.com By Robyn Hagan Cain on September 30, 2011 3:30 PM


by- the-numbers-supreme-court-reversal-and-the-ninth- circuit.html" Of course the Sixth Circuit is try to give them a run for the money now.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )