|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 07:29 PM EDT |
The question of the Judge's course of action has in fact already been appealed
and affirmed. I'm unclear how this means that I said there was no room for
future appeal.
Look, every Groklaw article on this case still has foolish comments like: how
can a US Judge prevent an injunction in Germany? These are questions that have
been settled in a well-reasoned, reviewed, and thoroughly documented manner. If
you are misinterpreting my statement to mean that this case has been finalized
and all appeals have been exhausted, I don't know why you would make such a poor
conclusion when I am fully aware that we now move on to the phase of the trial
where it is determined whether or not Motorola violated its contract so of
course I don't think there is no further review. Do I think there's little
chance of the judge being overruled on the matters of this being a contract
matter, that the court had to set a RAND rate, his methodology for setting that
rate, and so on? No, I do not -- maybe slight modifications but no major
overturning because the 9th Circuit signaled this is exactly what Robarts would
be required to do.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
