decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Samsung | 133 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple
Authored by: egan on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 11:06 PM EDT
Apple didn't exactly partner with Microsoft, but years ago it approached
Microsoft to invest in it, in order to maintain a droll charade that Microsoft
had competition in the PC market.

Microsoft bought something like $100mn or so of Apple's stock to keep it going
through some lean years, and ultimately Jobs beat Gates by creating the iPhone.
So yes, Apple did benefit.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Apple - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 01:36 AM EDT
  • Apple - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 27 2013 @ 12:35 AM EDT
Samsung
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 05:00 AM EDT
Samsung didn't exactly partner with Microsoft to any
significant with regard to Windows Phone 7/8, but it sure
did benefit massively when Microsoft took out the then
Smartphone leader Nokia by signing an exclusive deal with
Nokia to sell only their Windows phone lemons, which are
still not selling in significant numbers. This basically
killed off Symbian and Meego which were outselling Windows
Phone by an order of magnitude, and handed over their
marketshare to Samsung's Android phone and turned Nokia from
market leader when the deal was signed into a two bit player
in the biggest corporate sales collapse in recent history.

It is true to say that if Microsoft hadn't signed the
Windows phone exclusive deal with Nokia, Android would
probably not have as dominant a market share it does today.
Not that Microsoft has done badly out of it - Microsoft
earns much more money out of Android extortion scamming
(sorry patent licensing), than it does out of Windows phone.
The only loser is Nokia.

The moral of the story - be very careful about business
deals with a company which runs its business on protection
scams and racketeering in much the same way as the Mafia
did, and whose business practices come straight from the Al
Capone school of business, because if you accept business
deals on those terms, nothing good will come of it. Barnes
and Noble have shown how to deal with protection racket
mobsters and profit from them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Selling your business to MS might work...
Authored by: albert on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 12:49 PM EDT
but be sure you have a bullet-proof employment contract if you want to stay
working there.

I suspect most acquired businesses disappear like a bacterium into an amoeba.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )