Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

The license for this hammer is for hitting nails generally. | 131 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

The license for this hammer is for hitting nails generally.

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 07 2013 @ 06:38 AM EDT

I never realised a hammer (for nails) was included (deliberately) in the
structure of an aeroplane (various objects have been found in fuel tanks which
ought not be there).

With the chips they are still in the device; why should extra licences be
requred to *access* the chip? all licences should be supplied with the chip
otherwise it fails being fit for purpose as it cannot be used.

As soon as it is realised (ie made) that a EULA is adding terms after a contract
(ie after a contract of sale) has taken place is illegal, then suppliers of
software, etc will become liable. Having to purchased a patent licence to
access the patent containing device is nothing less than double dipping.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )