Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

One of ordinary skill in the art can know that something will work | 172 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

What?

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 03:53 PM EDT

I have no idea why you think that has any bearing on the discussion or why you
think the example is silly.

People can know things will work without seeing an embodiment.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What? - Authored by: PJ on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 05:45 PM EDT
What? - Authored by: Wol on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 06:16 AM EDT
- No. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 12:39 PM EDT

One of ordinary skill in the art can know that something will work

Authored by: jjs on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 08:05 PM EDT

The parent didn't say they didn't think we could reach the moon. The parent
said it had not been fully tested - which is true. No LEM had landed on the
moon and taken off before. NASA had high confidence, but it was not 100%.

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )