decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Microsoft re-releases botched patch as KB 2840149, but problems remain | 172 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Microsoft re-releases botched patch as KB 2840149, but problems remain
Authored by: complex_number on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 03:02 AM EDT
Microsoft and Patching... Now there is an unholy mess if ever I've seen one.

When you install the latest .Net V4 runtime, and you start patching it, you end
up downloading 3 or 4 times the size of the original software in patch/reboot
cycles the seem to go on endlessly.

I recently installed a clean Server 2008 R2 build (for a POC)onto a new HP box.
When I'd finished its patch/reboot cycle, I install .Net runtime V4 and carried
on. Installing the base OS took 20 minutes. Patching took 4 hours to complete.

At the same time I was installing RHEL 6.4(same POC) onto a similar box. In that
4 hours I'd installed and patched the OS (one reboot), installed and configured
a load of IBM WebSphere software and was about to load the user applications.

As The bard said,
(to paraphrase)
There is something really wrong in the state of Redmond.


---
Ubuntu & 'apt-get' are not the answer to Life, The Universe & Everything which
is of course, "42" or is it 1.618?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft's teat
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 03:15 PM EDT
Well, as they say, if you can't trust an OS's update mechanism, you can't trust the OS, but what chance do any of us have of pulling our family, friends or clients off the Microsoft teat (or, should i say, syringe)?
My daughter and her friends now regularly borrow one of my Ubuntu laptops. She claims that her Windows 7 laptop is too slow (several years newer than my old thinkpad) and the MacBook doesn't play minecraft very well with one button. Most people don't really care what is running behind the scenes they just want it to work. My daughter has Libre Office on her windows laptop so it was easy for her and her friends to switch to the Ubuntu laptop. Firefox is the pretty much the same on both platforms. A few years ago MSN was a must have and now Facebook has taken it's place. The only thing I use the VM for now is taxes. It's not hard to do a tax program, but there are annual updates, and it costs money to have it certified. Add multiple juridictions (federal, provincal, state...) and it gets costly and more complex.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft re-releases botched patch as KB 2840149, but problems remain
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 07:33 PM EDT
> but what chance do any of us have of pulling our family, friends or clients
off the Microsoft syringe

The answer depends upon why they use Microsoft.

The biggie, as always, is whether or not functionally equivalent software exists
in the FLOSS world. For the majority of low-end users, the answer is probably
yes. For the majority of ultra-high end users, the answer is probably yes. For
that mid-range user, the answer is probably no.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )