decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Hate to have to do this | 83 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I suppose so
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 08:20 PM EDT
Well, at least we seem to agree that some hedge fund
manager from nowhere is not an authority. I'm certainly
not either and I don't insist that such an event might
not have catalyzed a transient of some sort. What I question
is why 2 explosions and a dead president are only worth
150 points. Have any other tweets concurrent with that
event been analyzed for their possible effect on traders?
Have any other events of any kind been considered in that
time frame? Why just assume that the supposed cause
and effect are intimately related without asking any other
questions? That's great reporting, Thanks.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Hate to have to do this
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 25 2013 @ 10:57 PM EDT
If you notice, and this price action was not evident
in the articles unsurprisingly, the magnitude of the
opening gap over the previous days close was almost as
large although to the upside and took place in a shorter
amount of time. This fact somehow escapes commentary.
The sell off only closed the gap. Pretty typical action
that requires absolutely no ulterior motive or reason
what so ever.

http://www.barchart.com/chart.php%3fsym=%24DOWI&style=technical&template=&
amp;p=I&d=X&im=&sd=&ed=&size=M&log=0&t=BAR&v=0&a
mp;g=1&evnt=1&late=1&o1=&o2=&o3=&sh=100&indicators=&
amp;addindicator=&submitted=1&fpage=&txtDate=#jump

This is a one week 15 min chart if the link doesn't work.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )