decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Computers are by definition stupid. | 83 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
'Stupid' is perhaps the wrong word, 'paranoid' might..
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 04:17 PM EDT
"How could they be stupid? They're RICH!"

There are people who measure personal worth by the size of their possessions.
Wall Street isn't their Vatican, but it's certainly one of their chief cult
temples.

I suspect what happened here is that automated trades (involving no sanity
checks) were triggered, adding orders of magnitude to the size of the stock
market blip.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

'Stupid' is perhaps the wrong word, 'paranoid' might..
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 23 2013 @ 04:22 PM EDT
Professionally and for my education I have had to look into
stock exchange transactions and the stuff people buy and sell
and how they decide.

Paranoid is not the word, the word really is stupid!

Collectively stupid at a grand scale even. Unless you want to
call completely trusting computers to make your decisions for
you smart. OTH, the smart people that make their own decisions
probably had a very good day at the NYSE today >:)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Computers are by definition stupid.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 24 2013 @ 03:16 PM EDT
Actually, what almost certainly happened was that a bunch of computers saw the
(fake) news and automatically started selling. Remember, automated trading
systems operate at the millisecond level and taking even 50 milliseconds to
verify the news would put them behind competing systems causing them to lose
out. Since such hacks rarely happen it is actually "better" not to
check the validity of the news as long as it comes from a mostly reliable source
like the AP twitter feed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Reminds me of a game.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 24 2013 @ 03:22 PM EDT
It's called Flinch. One player holds out his hand and the other player either
pretends to slap it or tries to slap it. The first player must avoid having
his/her hand slapped without flinching on the pretend attacks. I think you get
the idea. The market is in a volitile state and the reactions to events are
just like the game. If it were really an investment system, it wouldn't be a
game of Flinch.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )